Everything the rider app gets, in the sheet the rider team keeps open.
Google Play reviews to Google Sheets
A sheet that fills itself. Every Google Play review lands as a row with its rating, app version, language and full text, newest at the top.
Set up in under five minutes • No demo required
Loop Rider · Google Play reviews
Google Sheets sync · every 30 minutes
| A | C | E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Score | Overall | Version |
| 2 | 1 | new O pagamento por Pix falha desde a atualização. Tive de pagar em dinheiro. | 5.14.0 |
| 3 | 5 | Fahrer kam pünktlich, App ist schnell und die Route stimmt. | 5.14.1 |
| 4 | 2 | Map freezes after the 5.14 update, every trip. Had to restart twice. | 5.14.0 |
| 5 | 5 | Por fin la hora de llegada es exacta. Cinco viajes esta semana sin fallos. | 5.14.1 |
| 6 | 4 | Driver ETA finally accurate. Wish the receipt came faster. | 5.14.1 |
| 7 | 3 | Correct, mais le paiement met dix secondes à valider. | 5.13.2 |
A sync, not an export somebody re-runs on Monday
Google Play reviews sync into a Google Sheet as they arrive. Each one is a row: the app, the rating, the date, the reviewer, the app version it was written on, the language, the full text and your tags. New rows land at row 2, so the newest review is the first thing you see when you open the sheet.
Nobody re-runs anything. Play Console's own export is one CSV per app per month, posted three to seven days after the fact, and someone still has to download each file, strip the header row and paste it under last month's. That is the Monday chore this replaces.
The sheet stays right after it fills, too. When a reviewer edits their review, the row updates. When Google removes one, the row goes. Reviewflowz checks every 30 minutes and writes only the difference, so what you see in the sheet is what is on Google Play.
Nothing to maintain, either. There is no Apps Script to patch, no scraper that breaks the week Google changes a page, and no monthly task budget to watch. You connect the app, pick the sheet, and keeping the sheet right stops being anybody's job.
Play Console export · one CSV per month · posted 3 to 7 days later
Loop Rider · Google Play reviews
- 10:02
3 new rows inserted at row 2
5.14.1 · en, pt, de
- 10:32
Row 41 updated
Reviewer edited their review, 2 stars to 4 stars
- 11:02
Row 118 removed
Review no longer on Google Play
- 11:32
Nothing changed
No write to the sheet
Newest review is always row 2.
The fastest release post-mortem you will ever build
Every row carries the app version the review was written against. Put Version in the rows of a pivot table, average the Score, and you have rating by release. That is the whole post-mortem, and it takes about a minute.
It settles the argument before it starts. The build everyone blames is either the one where the average drops, or it isn't. If 5.14.0 sits at 2.3 stars while 5.13.2 holds at 4.4, you know. If the two are level, the problem is somewhere else, and you have not spent the meeting finding that out.
Because the sheet updates itself, the pivot refreshes with it. The post-mortem is ready before the meeting instead of during it, and the same pivot is still right when someone asks about the next release, and the one after that.
On a staged rollout the clock is the whole point. Reviews on the new build reach the sheet as they arrive rather than at the end of the month, so the average for a version is readable while the rollout is still partial and stopping it is still a decision rather than a cleanup.
| Row | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Version | Reviews | Avg Score |
| 2 | 5.12.4 | 988 | 4.5 |
| 3 | 5.13.2 | 1,204 | 4.4 |
| 4 | 5.14.0 | 486 | 2.3 |
| 5 | 5.14.1 | 845 | 4.1 |
Column O is Version, Google Play's appVersionName.
A localisation bug looks like one language
Google Play reviews arrive with the language they were written in, and that lands in its own column. Pivot by language instead of by version and a release that broke in one market shows up as one row that looks nothing like the others.
Portuguese at 2.1 while every other language sits above four is not a rating problem. It is a string that didn't ship, a payment method that only fails in one currency, or a date format nobody tested. The sheet points at the market, and the review text in the next column says what went wrong.
Filter the same column down to one language and you have the batch to hand to whoever owns that market, in the words the reviewers used, without anyone copying a spreadsheet together by hand first.
Google Play gives you the language, not the country. For most markets those are the same answer, and where they are not you will know it from the first three reviews you read. Either way it is a column that was already there, not a report somebody has to commission first.
Average Score by language · Version 5.14.1
O pagamento por Pix continua falhando na versão 5.14.1. Tive de pagar em dinheiro outra vez.
Choose what lands, and keep a sheet per app
Sync every Google Play review, or narrow the feed first. Pick the apps, keep only one language, or cap the rating so the sheet holds nothing above two stars. A sheet of one-stars with the app version beside each is a bug list that writes itself.
When the teams reading them differ, give each app its own sheet. The driver app's reviews go to the sheet the driver team keeps open, the rider app's go to theirs, and nobody scrolls past the other team's rows to find their own.
Or put several apps in one sheet and let the Profile Name column tell them apart. A pivot with the app in the rows and the month across the columns is the portfolio view, built from the same rows as everything else.
Most Google Play ratings arrive with no text at all: a star, and nothing else. Switch those off and the sheet holds only the reviews somebody actually wrote, which is the difference between a thousand rows you scroll past and two hundred you read. The filter sits on the sync, so the noise never reaches the sheet for anyone to filter back out.
One and two stars only, each with the app version beside it.
Two syncs, two sheets, both written every 30 minutes.
Full on day one, shared like any other sheet
Load your history and the sheet is full before the first new review arrives. Every Google Play review Reviewflowz holds for the app goes in, so the version pivot has a trend line on day one rather than in three months.
Then share it the way you share any sheet. The product manager who wants the pivot, the agency that owns the Brazilian launch, the founder who reads one-stars on Sunday: they open a Google Sheet. No Reviewflowz login, nothing to install, nothing to explain.
It is a normal sheet, so everything you already know works on it. Filter views, conditional formatting on the Score column, a chart on the pivot, a Looker Studio report reading the same tab. Build the monthly rollup once and it keeps producing itself.
The synced tab looks after itself, too. Reviewflowz marks it as managed, so Google warns anyone about to type over a row the sync owns, and the sync only ever writes that one tab. Build your pivots, your filter views and your charts on a second tab and nothing you make collides with what arrives next.
Loop Rider reviews
Reviews tab · 28 columns · every 30 minutes
One action, so the version pivot has a trend line today.
None of them has a Reviewflowz login. They open a Google Sheet.
Stop pasting Google Play reviews into a spreadsheet
Set up in under five minutes. No demo required.
Is this a live sync or a one-off export?
A sync. Reviewflowz checks for new and changed Google Play reviews every 30 minutes and writes only the difference: new rows at the top, edited reviews updated in place, removed reviews dropped. Nothing is re-run by hand, and there is no file to download.
Which columns does the sheet have?
The header row is fixed. For a Google Play review the filled columns are Review ID, Profile Name (the app), Platform, Overall (the review text), Score, Review Date, Language, Reviewer Name, Review Locale, Version, Tags and External Review ID. A few columns exist for other review platforms, such as Pros, Cons and Reviewer Company, and stay empty on Google Play rows.
Does the first sync include our Google Play history?
Yes, on a paid plan. One click loads every Google Play review Reviewflowz holds for the app, so the pivot has a trend line from day one. During the free trial the sheet fills from new reviews as they arrive.
Can I put more than one app in the sheet?
Yes. One sync can cover several apps, and the Profile Name column says which app each row came from. When different teams read different apps, run one sync per app, each into its own sheet.
Do I need a demo to get started?
No. You connect your Google Play app, pick Google Sheets and choose the sheet yourself, in under five minutes. 14 day free trial, no credit card.





